Case 3300024/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Thirtl v Crossacre Tippers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300024/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Thirtl
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 and records two monetary findings in favour of the claimant, Mr S Thirtl, against Crossacre Tippers Ltd. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £926.92.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £21,343.92. No separate breakdown beyond those two sums is given in the extracted text, and no additional remedy components are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £926.92. | Upheld | — | £927 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £21,343.92. | Upheld | — | £21,344 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,271
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.