Case 3300032/2023 · Employment Tribunal
A Williams v Norwich City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300032/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in A Williams v Norwich City Council, case number 3300032/2023. The Employment Tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds and that the claimant's remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations or any separate liability reasoning in the extracted text provided. It does, however, identify the respondent as Norwich City Council and records the outcome as a successful claim for the claimant, with no monetary award fixed in this judgment.
Because remedy was expressly left to a Remedy Hearing, no compensation figure or breakdown is recorded here. The judgment was sent to the parties on 14 August 2023, following the Employment Judge's judgment dated 28 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment is a Rule 21 judgment stating that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.