Case 3300038/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Propertyshark Ltd T/a Re-max Ambassador — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300038/2019
- Decision date
- 22 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a Sales Negotiator from 17 June 2018 to 19 November 2018 on a salary of £16,000 per annum plus commission. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, read the respondent’s witness statement from the response form, and gave it less weight because the respondent was not available for cross-examination.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the contract stated 21 days’ annual leave, but the claimant was a full-time worker and therefore had an entitlement of 28 days under Regulation 13A(3) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found that she took no leave during employment and was entitled on termination to 9.3 days accrued but untaken leave, valued at £55.90 per day, producing an award of £519.87 under Regulation 14.
On wages, the tribunal found that the claimant’s July salary instalment was underpaid by £188.55. It also found that £50 had been deducted from commission without any contractual clause authorising deductions or other lawful authority. The claimant said her commission should have been £300 but she received £250 because of a VAT charge imposed by the respondent; the tribunal accepted that evidence and awarded £50 for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal therefore awarded the claimant £519.87 for unpaid holiday pay, £50 for unlawful deduction from wages, and £188.55 for unpaid wages, making a total judgment sum of £758.42.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination under Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found the claimant had taken no annual leave, was entitled to 9.3 days accrued leave, and awarded £519.87. | Upheld | — | £520 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a £50 deduction from commission was made without any contractual provision or other lawful authority. It awarded £50, being the difference between commission of £300 and £250 received. | Upheld | — | £50 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was underpaid £188.55 in respect of her July salary instalment and awarded that sum as wages outstanding on termination. | Upheld | — | £189 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £758
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Regulation 13A(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.