Case 3300039/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Trumpington Farm Company and others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300039/2022
- Decision date
- 28 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis recorded a short judgment disposing of the proceedings after the claimant withdrew the claims. The judgment states that any claim against the third respondent, Laura Hill, any claim of direct discrimination, and any claim in respect of an offer of settlement made on 25 October 2021 were dismissed following that withdrawal.
The judgment does not contain findings on liability, does not identify a remedy award, and does not set out any legal analysis beyond the procedural dismissal. It is therefore limited to the formal disposal of the listed claims after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that any claim against the third respondent, Laura Hill, was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the direct discrimination claim was dismissed following withdrawal. The case listing supplied with the record identifies the matter as age discrimination. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Other | The judgment states that any claim in respect of an offer of settlement made on 25 October 2021 was dismissed following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.