Case 3300042/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Samuel Siaw Kwaku v Farmdrop Company Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300042/2022
- Decision date
- 14 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Samuel Siaw Kwaku
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Samuel Siaw Kwaku's claim against Farmdrop Company Ltd. The judgment did not decide the merits of the claim or make a monetary award.
Farmdrop Company Ltd was in administration. The Tribunal recorded that neither the Administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained to continue the proceedings as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. It also recorded that, after being given an opportunity on 23 January 2024 to explain in writing why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit, the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to "the claim"; the working-time classification comes from the supplied gov.uk listing category and was not stated in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986 requirement for the Administrator's consent or the court's permission to continue proceedings
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.