Case 3300043/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 24/7 Care Providers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300043/2019
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with joined claims against 24/7 Care Providers Limited. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that no application had been made to restore it to the Register of Companies.
On 11 May 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claims should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
Employment Judge Laidler therefore struck out the claims on 19 July 2021. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages allegations and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was struck out after the tribunal noted that the respondent company had been dissolved and had not been restored to the Register of Companies, and that no acceptable reason had been given to avoid strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out for the same reasons stated in the judgment: the respondent company had been dissolved, had not been restored, and the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after the tribunal's 11 May 2021 opportunity to respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.