Case 3300047/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ndoro v Gain Healthcare Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300047/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Ndoro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response to the claim. The Employment Tribunal therefore entered judgment in favour of Mr C Ndoro under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment records a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal found that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded £441 in compensation, ordering the Respondent to pay that sum to the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the Respondent failed to present a response and judgment was entered in favour of the Claimant under Rule 21. The claim is described as 'Unauthorised Deduction from Wages'. | Upheld | — | £441 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £441
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £441
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.