Case 3300050/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Stevens v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300050/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Stevens
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the time for presenting a response had expired and that no valid response had been presented in time. On the information before Employment Judge M Warren, the Claimant, Mr J Stevens, succeeded in his claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay.
The judgment ordered the Respondent, Mr Milon Maha, to pay Mr Stevens £441.16 without deduction. The award was stated to be taxable in the hands of the Claimant.
The decision is a short written judgment and does not set out separate reasons, a split between the wage and holiday pay elements, or any additional remedy components beyond the single sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim of unpaid wages succeeds. The award was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for holiday pay succeeds. The award was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £441
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.