Case 3300053/2019 · Employment Tribunal
I person For the v Mr C Cuckney, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300053/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
I person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 7-9 June 2021, Employment Judge Bedeau heard Ms Kelly Carroll's claims against Jewish Community Secondary School (JCoSS). The tribunal extended time on just and equitable grounds so that the disability discrimination claims could be heard and determined.
The claim of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed as not well-founded. The disability discrimination claims were also dismissed: the claim of discrimination arising in consequence of disability and the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments both failed.
The extracted record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy was awarded or set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal and dismisses it as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim pleaded as discrimination arising in consequence of disability; time was extended on a just and equitable basis so the disability discrimination claims could be heard and determined. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim pleaded as failure to make reasonable adjustments; time was extended on a just and equitable basis so the disability discrimination claims could be heard and determined. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.