Case 3300054/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Williams v Sixteen Plus Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300054/2018
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 February 2022, the tribunal gave Ms K Williams an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why her claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record a substantive determination on the merits or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.