Case 3300057/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Juraj Vysvader v The Garden Pub Ltd - The Woodman — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300057/2020
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Juraj Vysvader
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 March 2021 at Watford, Employment Judge Bedeau struck out the claim of constructive unfair dismissal because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service with the respondent, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The judgment then recorded that, once the respondent sent the claimant his P45, wage slips for the period 2 to 30 September 2019, and £100 to cover the fixed penalty incurred for late submission of his self-assessment tax return, all remaining claims against the respondent would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Struck out for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service with the respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal together with the other remaining claims after the respondent was to send the claimant his P45, wage slips for 2 to 30 September 2019 and £100. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal together with the other remaining claims; the judgment does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal together with the other remaining claims after the respondent was to send the claimant his P45, wage slips for 2 to 30 September 2019 and £100. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed upon withdrawal together with the other remaining claims; the judgment does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.