Case 3300058/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ericsson Evora v Pax Travel Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300058/2022
- Decision date
- 28 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ericsson Evora
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claims. Employment Judge Bedeau therefore entered judgment for Mr Ericsson Evora in respect of statutory redundancy pay, unfair dismissal, accrued unpaid holiday, and wrongful dismissal.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay statutory redundancy pay of £10,608. It also awarded £34,704 in unfair dismissal compensation, £2,409.71 for unpaid holiday, and £7,726.08 as notice pay.
The judgment stated that the total sum payable was £55,447.79. It also recorded that the recoupment provisions applied, with a prescribed element of £34,704 for the period from 1 October 2021 to 28 July 2022 and an excess of £20,743.79.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent failed to present a response to the claims, and judgment was entered for statutory redundancy pay in the sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £10,608 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded unfair dismissal compensation in the amount stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £34,704 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as accrued unpaid holiday. | Upheld | — | £2,410 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £7,726 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £55,448
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £34,704
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.