Case 3300067/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Brooks v Smurfit Kappa UK Limited Heard: Norwich — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300067/2020
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Panel members
- Mr B McSweeney, Ms L Gaywood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Brooks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr P Brooks brought claims for notice pay, holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages. Those claims were dismissed because they had been withdrawn. The written decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal also dismissed Mr Brooks's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims. The short written judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasons for those findings, and it records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a claim for notice pay that was dismissed upon having been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim failed and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the disability discrimination claim failed and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.