Case 3300070/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v LHR Airports Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300070/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter by telephone on 31 March 2020 before Employment Judge Hawksworth sitting alone. The decision recorded was a judgment on costs.
The respondent's application for costs under rule 76(1)(a) and rule 76(2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 succeeded. The claimants were ordered to pay the respondent's legal costs of £2,040.60, described as costs incurred for attendance at the hearing on 21 August 2019.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment adjudicated the respondent's application for costs under rule 76(1)(a) and rule 76(2), not the underlying listed wage or working time claims. | Upheld | — | £2,041 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,041
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 76(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 76(2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.