Case 3300075/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v BCL Recruitment Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300075/2019
- Decision date
- 28 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss A Dobi, brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against BCL Recruitment Ltd. The respondent did not appear at the hearing before Employment Judge Daniels at Watford on 27 September 2019.
The tribunal found the unlawful deductions from wages claim well founded in the gross sum of £80. It also recorded that the correct name of the respondent was BCL Recruitment Ltd.
The judgment notes that the respondent appeared to be insolvent, stating that the company went into voluntary liquidation on 28 June 2019 and/or was wound up on the same date. On that basis, the tribunal said no further action was to be taken as a result, and noted that the claimant may wish to apply to the National Insurance Fund.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages well founded in the gross sum of £80. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal noted that BCL Recruitment Ltd appeared to be insolvent, having gone into voluntary liquidation and/or been wound up on 28 June 2019, and said no further action was to be taken by the tribunal as a result. | Upheld | — | £80 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £80
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.