Case 3300077/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Vecci v Jemma Trinick — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300077/2025
- Decision date
- 13 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Vecci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 12 January 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s monetary claims. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £475 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £950 damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £166.25, and failed to pay a petrol reimbursement and ordered £81. The judgment records a total award of £1,672.25.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have sufficient length of service to bring such a claim and no exception to that rule appeared to apply.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £475 gross. | Upheld | — | £475 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £950. | Upheld | — | £950 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £166.25. | Upheld | — | £166 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay a petrol reimbursement and ordered payment of £81; the judgment does not assign this to a more specific claim type. | Upheld | — | £81 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have sufficient length of service to claim unfair dismissal and no exception appeared to apply. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,672
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.