Case 3300090/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Nicolaou, Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300090/2024
- Decision date
- 10 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone on 3 December 2024. The issue decided was whether Mr Finn was a disabled person on 23 October 2023, the date his employment ended. The tribunal applied section 6 Equality Act 2010 and considered the effect of treatment under Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1).
The tribunal accepted that Mr Finn had been suffering from significant gastrointestinal problems in spring and summer 2023 after bariatric surgery, including repeated vomiting, acid reflux, fatigue, disturbed sleep, reduced concentration, and difficulty eating and retaining food. It relied on the contemporaneous medical records, including consultations in May and June 2023, and accepted his evidence that the condition was having a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities.
On long-term effect, the tribunal found that the medication produced only a temporary improvement and that the medical evidence indicated a likely relapse if treatment stopped. It considered the condition likely to last until at least June 2024 and beyond, and noted further sickness absence and endoscopy findings in late 2023 showing ulcers and anaemia. The tribunal therefore found that Mr Finn qualified as a disabled person on 23 October 2023. No monetary remedy was determined at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open preliminary hearing only. The tribunal determined that the claimant was a disabled person on 23 October 2023, but did not decide liability for any substantive discrimination complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.