Case 3300091/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Fielder v Bowles Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300091/2020
- Decision date
- 9 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received to the claimant’s claim, the tribunal entered judgment on the papers. It found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £346.15. It also found unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £553.11.
The judgment further records £135 for unpaid pension contributions and £126.45 for unpaid expenses, and it says the claimant was not paid for 2.8 days of accrued but untaken holiday, awarded at £195.23. The final paragraph states judgment for £553.11 gross and a further £667.83 as set out above, so the extracted text contains an internal arithmetic inconsistency.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £346 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment also mentions £135 for unpaid pension contributions and £126.45 for unpaid expenses. The final paragraph states judgment for £553.11 gross and a further £667.83, so the arithmetic in the extracted text does not fully reconcile. | Upheld | — | £553 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 2.8 days of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £195 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,221
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.