Case 3300096/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Din not attend, nor represented For the v Mr C Johnson, Tribunal Advocate — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300096/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Din not attend, nor represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Imoukhede presented claims for race discrimination, unfair dismissal and accrued unpaid holiday. The respondent’s case was that she had been dismissed for gross misconduct after allegations that she made malicious and harassing communications to a fellow employee, that the police matter was resolved by Community Resolution, and that the respondent then ran disciplinary proceedings. The tribunal noted that her grievance was not upheld and that her appeal was also not upheld.
The judgment recorded that the race discrimination claim had not been accepted because she had not served further information by the date ordered by Employment Judge Manley. By the final hearing on 6 August 2021, the claimant did not attend, had not complied with tribunal orders, and her representatives had come off the record after repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact her. The respondent attended with witnesses and documents.
Applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the judge was satisfied that the claimant had failed to engage with the proceedings and had not actively pursued her case. On that basis, all claims against the respondent were dismissed. The judge added that, if necessary, the claims would alternatively have been struck out under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal recorded on 17 October 2020 that this claim had not been accepted because the claimant had not served the ordered further information by 27 July 2020. The final judgment nevertheless dismissed all claims under rule 47. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.