Case 3300096/2024 · Employment Tribunal
the Claimant attended without v Mr S. Gittins — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300096/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
the Claimant attended without
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing at Watford on 27 February 2025, Employment Judge Hunt recorded that the claimant attended without representation and that the respondent was represented by Mr S. Gittins. The only substantive decision set out in the written record is that the respondent's application to strike out all or part of the claim was dismissed.
The decision also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not requested. The written judgment therefore does not set out any substantive findings on liability, any legal test applied to the underlying claim, or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This entry records the respondent's application to strike out all or part of the claim. The written record does not contain a substantive determination of the underlying claim(s). | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.