Case 3300099/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300099/2021
- Decision date
- 22 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich on 10 October 2022 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr Welch, Counsel, and a Mandarin-speaking interpreter, Miss Kim Ng, attended.
The written judgment records that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. It also states that the unfair dismissal claims were dismissed as no longer actively pursued, in any event.
The tribunal further ordered that the claimant's claims be struck out because he had consistently failed to comply with the Tribunal's orders to further progress his claim. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that the unfair dismissal claims were dismissed as no longer actively pursued, in any event. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The written record says the claimant's claims were struck out because he had consistently failed to comply with the Tribunal's orders to further progress the claim, but it does not identify the separate claims individually. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.