Case 3300099/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Failed to attend For the v Failed to attend — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300099/2024
- Decision date
- 12 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Failed to attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for redundancy pay, notice pay and unpaid wages against Pinford End Ltd, which was described in the judgment as being in voluntary liquidation.
Neither party attended the hearing on 12 January 2026. Employment Judge King dismissed the claimant's claims as not being actively pursued because the claimant failed to attend the hearing arranged to determine them.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim for redundancy pay was dismissed as not being actively pursued after the claimant failed to attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay and dismisses it as not being actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid wages and dismisses it as not being actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.