Case 3300104/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Morrison v Simon Jersey Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300104/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing at Reading on 2 December 2020, Employment Judge Anstis struck out Miss L Morrison's claims against Simon Jersey Limited. The written record does not set out the substantive reasons for the strike-out, but it records that the hearing was conducted by CVP and that the parties did not object to the remote format.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The tribunal therefore recorded only the outcome, not the underlying findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not specify the individual pleaded claim labels; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK case listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not specify the individual pleaded claim labels; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK case listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not specify the individual pleaded claim labels; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK case listing categories supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.