Case 3300119/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300119/2024
- Decision date
- 30 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by CVP on 30 July 2024 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Cullen, Counsel.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practical for the claimant to have issued his claims for breach of contract and unfair dismissal within three months of the effective date of termination. On that basis, both claims were dismissed.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any compensation or other monetary order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it was reasonably practical for the claimant to have issued the claim within three months of the effective date of termination, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it was reasonably practical for the claimant to have issued the claim within three months of the effective date of termination, so the breach of contract claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practical
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.