Case 3300127/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms Larissa Johnson T/a Bespoke Housekeeping — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300127/2020
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford via CVP on 16 October 2020 before Employment Judge Skehan. The claimant and respondent both appeared in person. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for breach of contract and unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful in part.
The judgment ordered Ms Larissa Johnson, trading as Bespoke Housekeeping, to pay the claimant £126.38 within 28 days of the judgment. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records the breach of contract and unauthorised deduction from wages claims together as successful in part, and does not apportion the £126.38 award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records the breach of contract and unauthorised deduction from wages claims together as successful in part, and does not apportion the £126.38 award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £126
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.