Case 3300129/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S M Tanvir v Ennite-IT Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300129/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S M Tanvir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S M Tanvir brought a claim against Ennite-IT Ltd in the South East Employment Tribunals. The claim was issued on 10 January 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and by 7 July 2022 at the latest the tribunal considered that the proceeding had come to the respondent’s attention. No application to respond out of time had been made, and no draft response had been sent to the tribunal.
Proceeding under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal determined the claim on the papers. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £23,700 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, no application to respond out of time was before the tribunal, and no draft response had been sent. The tribunal determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £23,700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,700
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.