Case 3300142/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Grimwood v Total Home Delivery Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300142/2025
- Decision date
- 5 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Grimwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 22 judgment, the tribunal found Mr K Grimwood’s claim against Total Home Delivery Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded. The judgment included unpaid wages, holiday pay and deductions ostensibly made for pension contributions within that claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay within 14 days £2,892.04 gross in unpaid wages, £3,620 gross in holiday pay and £287.38 gross deducted ostensibly for pension contributions. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made no corresponding contributions to the claimant’s pension. These components total £6,799.42 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment treats unpaid wages, holiday pay and pension-related deductions as components of a single unauthorised deductions claim. The award is the calculated sum of £2,892.04, £3,620 and £287.38, all gross. | Upheld | — | £6,799 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,799
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Rights Act 1996, section 13
- Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.