Case 3300143/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Singh, representative For the v Mr G Turner, solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300143/2017
- Decision date
- 31 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs A Brosnan, Mr C Leslie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Singh, representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Watford on 13 January 2020 before Employment Judge R Lewis, Mrs A Brosnan and Mr C Leslie. The written judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. It does not set out any substantive findings on liability or identify the individual complaints in the body of the judgment.
No monetary award or other remedy was recorded. The written record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless a request was made within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; the claim type is inferred from the case context. The judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; the claim type is inferred from the case context. The judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not identify this complaint separately; the claim type is inferred from the case context. The judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.