Case 3300153/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Cherneva v Go Resource Management Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300153/2022
- Decision date
- 18 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Cherneva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 11 January 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Miss N Cherneva had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her damages of £1,666.66. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £984.75.
The judgment also states that there is no entitlement to compensation for emotional distress in a breach of contract claim. No separate award for injury to feelings or interest was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as damages for notice following dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement; the judgment does not state the underlying statutory basis. | Upheld | — | £985 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,651
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.