Case 3300155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Belcher v Boardworks Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300155/2022
- Decision date
- 25 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Belcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis gave a Rule 21 judgment in Mrs R Belcher v Boardworks Ltd. The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,868.76. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,963.72.
Separate awards were made for unpaid holiday entitlement of £749.76 and for breach of contract in respect of unpaid pension contributions of £2,137.93. The total amount payable under the judgment was £11,720.17.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,868.76. | Upheld | — | £4,869 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,963.72. | Upheld | — | £3,964 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £749.76. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded £2,137.93 for breach of contract in respect of unpaid pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,138 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.