Case 3300165/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Campbell-Thomas v Knights of Old Limited (in administration), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300165/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Campbell-Thomas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had previously made a protective award in the claimant's favour on 20 September 2024, the administrators of the first respondent having consented to that claim proceeding. The claimant's gross weekly pay at the date of dismissal was £700.00, giving an entitlement to £9,002.00 of remuneration during the protected period. The claimant had already received £5,600.00 from the Secretary of State on account of this entitlement.
The parties were given an opportunity to show cause why judgment should not be entered against the first respondent for the unpaid balance, and no representations were received. The Tribunal therefore entered judgment against the first respondent (Knights of Old Limited, in administration) for the balance of £3,402.00. The Recoupment Regulations were stated to apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award balance claim. A protective award was made on 20 September 2024 entitling the claimant to £9,002.00 (£700.00 gross weekly pay across the protected period). The claimant had received £5,600.00 from the Secretary of State, leaving an unpaid balance of £3,402.00 ordered against the first respondent. The Recoupment Regulations apply. Classified as 'other' as the §4.4 enum has no dedicated 'protective_award' / collective consultation (s.189 TULR(C)A 1992) category. | Upheld | — | £3,402 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,402
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.