Case 3300179/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Romain v Vodafone Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300179/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms E Bristow, Ms C Whitehouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Romain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was subject to unlawful victimisation when a grievance was raised against her. The written judgment records the outcome but not the detailed reasons, as reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £7,000 compensation for injury to feelings and £759.45 interest, producing a total award of £7,759.45. The claimant's other claims were dismissed, but the written judgment does not identify those claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claimant was subject to unlawful victimisation when a grievance was raised against her. It does not identify the protected act or any protected characteristic in the written judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,759 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's other claims are dismissed, but the written judgment does not identify those claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,759
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.