Case 3300181/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ferris v Knights of Old Limited (in administration), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300181/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Ferris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a protective award made by the Tribunal on 20 September 2024 (with the consent of the first respondent's administrators), the claimant was entitled to remuneration of £9,002.00 during the protected period, based on a weekly gross pay of £700.00 at the date of dismissal. The Secretary of State for Business and Trade had paid £5,600.00 on account of that entitlement.
The parties were given an opportunity to show cause why judgment should not be entered against the first respondent for the unpaid balance. No representations were received. The Tribunal therefore entered judgment against the first respondent, Knights of Old Limited (in administration), for the outstanding £3,402.00, with the Recoupment Regulations applying.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under TULRCA. The Tribunal made a protective award on 20 September 2024; this judgment enters the unpaid balance of remuneration due during the protected period (£9,002.00 entitlement less £5,600.00 paid by the Secretary of State = £3,402.00) against the first respondent. The Recoupment Regulations apply. | Upheld | — | £3,402 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,402
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.