Case 3300185/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Gray v Knights of Old Limited (in administration), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300185/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Gray
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the first respondent's administrators had consented to the claim proceeding and that, at a hearing on 20 September 2024, a protective award had been made in favour of the claimant.
The claimant's gross weekly pay at dismissal was £700.00, giving entitlement to £9,002.00 remuneration during the protected period. The claimant had received £5,600.00 from the Secretary of State on account of that sum.
The parties were given an opportunity to show cause why judgment should not be entered against the first respondent for the unpaid balance. No representations were received, so judgment was entered against the first respondent for £3,402.00, with the Recoupment Regulations applying.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment concerns entry of judgment for the unpaid balance of remuneration due under a protective award made on 20 September 2024; the locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category. | Upheld | — | £3,402 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,402
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.