Case 3300193/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Zoe Willis v Equiis Technologies Switzerland AG — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300193/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Zoe Willis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Miss Zoe Willis's claim against Equiis Technologies Switzerland AG. The employment judge recorded that the respondent owed the claimant and ordered payment of £18,000 gross by way of unpaid wages, with the respondent required to deduct and account to HMRC for income tax and national insurance contributions.
The judgment does not set out any detailed findings of fact or legal analysis beyond the award. On the face of the text, the claim was treated as one for unpaid wages, and the claim succeeded in full in the amount ordered. No separate findings on additional remedies, interest, or other heads of loss are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent owed the claimant and ordered payment of £18,000 gross by way of unpaid wages, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £18,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.