Case 3300194/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jacob v Knights of Old Limited (in administration), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300194/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Jacob
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the first respondent, Knights of Old Limited (in administration). At a hearing on 20 September 2024, with the administrators' consent to the claim proceeding, the Tribunal made a protective award in the claimant's favour. The claimant's weekly gross pay at the date of dismissal was £596.25, giving an entitlement of £7,667.78 during the protected period.
The claimant had received £4,770.00 from the Secretary of State for Business and Trade on account of that entitlement, leaving an unpaid balance of £2,897.78. The parties were given the opportunity to show cause why the Tribunal should not enter judgment against the first respondent for that balance, and no representations were received.
The Tribunal therefore ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant £2,897.78 in unpaid wages under the protective award. The judgment records that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Protective award claim under TULRCA following collective redundancy. Tribunal had made a protective award on 20 September 2024; this judgment enters judgment against the first respondent for the unpaid balance of remuneration due during the protected period. Recoupment Regulations apply. | Upheld | — | £2,898 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,898
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.