Case 3300195/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Apicella v Mr A Grossi t/a Tonino's Pizzeria Heard: by Cloud Video Platform — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300195/2021
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Apicella
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, recorded the respondent's admissions that it had failed to afford the claimant paid annual leave and had failed to pay him for 25-27 August 2020. By consent, the claimant was awarded £846.92 gross for accrued but untaken annual leave and £170.84 gross for the unpaid three days.
The claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal was found well-founded, and damages of £400 gross were awarded. The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the minimum sum of £800 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, and stated that all gross sums were payable subject to deductions for tax and/or National Insurance required by law.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Respondent admitted the failure to afford the claimant the right to paid annual leave; award made by consent. | Upheld | — | £847 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent admitted failure to pay the claimant for 25-27 August 2020; award made by consent. | Upheld | — | £171 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of wrongful dismissal well-founded and awarded damages gross. | Upheld | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,218
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.