Case 3300201/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Weekes v Red Balloon Learning Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300201/2022
- Decision date
- 28 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Weekes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 August 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr J Weekes until 22 August 2022 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out under rule 37. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant in a manner that was scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, that he had not complied with the Tribunal’s order dated 15 May 2022, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Weekes did not make any written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 8 September 2022 was vacated. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying claim and does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.