Case 3300210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr Christopher Pinion (3300210/2022) (2) Mr Paul Tickner (3300239-3300241/2022) (3) Ms Alyson Tropeano (3300822-3300823/2022) v 316 Engineering Limited (in Administration) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300210/2022
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr Christopher Pinion (3300210/2022) (2) Mr Paul Tickner (3300239-3300241/2022) (3) Ms Alyson Tropeano (3300822-3300823/2022)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimants worked at a single establishment and that there was no recognised trade union. It also recorded that the first respondent did not submit a Response, although the administrator consented to the claims proceeding, and the tribunal heard evidence from the claimants and considered written submissions from the second respondent.
On the facts before it, the tribunal found that the first respondent failed to organise the election of employee representatives and consult with them in accordance with sections 188 and 188A of TULRCA. It also found that the respondent failed to provide the information required by section 188(4) and failed to consult as required by sections 188(1) and (2).
The tribunal therefore declared the claims under section 189 of TULRCA well founded and made a protective award in favour of the claimants. The protected period was 90 days beginning on 3 December 2021.
The judgment states that a protective award is a two-stage process and that no financial award is made at this stage. The claimants must seek payment of their individual awards separately, and any failure to pay, or dispute about the amount payable, would be dealt with under a further claim under section 192 of TULRCA. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 were held to apply to the awards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under TULRCA s.189. The tribunal found the claims well founded and made a protective award for a 90-day protected period beginning on 3 December 2021. The judgment notes that this is a two-stage process and that no financial award was quantified at this stage. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.188 TULRCA
- s.188A TULRCA
- s.189 TULRCA
- s.192 TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.