Case 3300220/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Dennis (Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300220/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner Moore
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 21 June 2021 before Employment Judge Milner Moore. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Dennis, solicitor. The judgment states that all issues could be determined in a remote hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim. Its reason was that the claimant received the contractual notice to which he was entitled.
The tribunal also dismissed the claims for unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and for unpaid annual leave under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant received the contractual notice to which he was entitled. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim brought under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid annual leave under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.