Case 3300221/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Rose v Mr J.S. James trading as The Plough on the Green — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300221/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Rose
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms L Rose, brought complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, breach of contract, and non-payment of holiday pay against Mr J.S. James trading as The Plough on the Green. The hearing took place at Reading via CVP before Employment Judge T.R. Smith on 11 August 2021. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and issued a written record of the decision dated 11 August 2021.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and declared it well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £82 forthwith. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate heads of loss or additional statutory components.
The breach of contract complaint was found not well founded and was dismissed. The complaint of non-payment of holiday pay was also found not well founded and dismissed. No discrimination, whistleblowing, or unfair dismissal findings were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of £82 forthwith. | Upheld | — | £82 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found this complaint not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of non-payment of holiday pay was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £82
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.