Case 3300234/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P West v Knights of Old Limited (in administration), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300234/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P West
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing on 20 September 2024, at which the first respondent's administrators had consented to the claim proceeding, the Tribunal had made a protective award in favour of the claimant. The claimant's weekly gross pay at the date of dismissal was £700.00, giving an entitlement of £9,002.00 during the protected period, of which £5,600.00 had already been paid on account by the Secretary of State.
The parties were given an opportunity to show cause why the Tribunal should not enter judgment against the first respondent for the balance of the remuneration due, and no representations were received. Judgment was accordingly entered against the first respondent ordering it to pay the claimant the unpaid balance of £3,402.00, with the Recoupment Regulations to apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award balance under TULRCA. Tribunal had made the protective award on 20 September 2024; this judgment enters judgment against the first respondent for the unpaid balance of £3,402.00 (entitlement £9,002.00 during the protected period, less £5,600.00 already paid by the Secretary of State). The Recoupment Regulations apply. | Upheld | — | £3,402 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,402
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.