Case 3300244/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Harrington, CAB For the v No ET3 filed – No — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300244/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Harrington, CAB For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 10 January 2023 at Bury St Edmunds, Employment Judge K J Palmer sat alone. The claimant, Miss Rosemary Turney, was represented by Mr Harrington of CAB. The respondent, Anglia Cleaning Solutions Limited, filed no ET3 and did not appear.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay five sums said to be due at termination of employment: £303.98 for holiday pay in lieu of accrued untaken holiday, £12.00 for unpaid pension payments described as an unlawful deduction of wages, £77.35 for unpaid expenses, £327.00 for unpaid wages described as an unlawful deduction of wages, and £65.40 for unpaid notice pay.
The written record contains only the operative decision. It states that the total due is £785.73 and that the amount is payable immediately. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay in lieu of accrued untaken holiday at termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unpaid pension payments described in the judgment as an unlawful deduction of wages at termination. | Upheld | — | £12 |
| Other | Awarded as unpaid expenses due and owing at termination; the judgment does not specify a separate statutory label. | Upheld | — | £77 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unpaid wages described in the judgment as an unlawful deduction in wages at termination. | Upheld | — | £327 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as unpaid notice pay; the judgment does not expressly identify the legal basis beyond the operative order. | Upheld | — | £65 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £786
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.