Case 3300259/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Alder v Newrest Inflight UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300259/2021
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Alder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 November 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr J Alder an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The extracted judgment records that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge George struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits or any monetary award. It is dated 13 December 2022 and was sent to the parties on 3 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the text extracted here. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 9 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.