Case 3300264/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J. Sawyer v Direct Approach Marketing Limited Full Merits Hearing — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300264/2022
- Decision date
- 17 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mrs Gaywood, Mr Allan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J. Sawyer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mrs J. Sawyer's unfair dismissal claim against Direct Approach Marketing Limited. It found that she had been unfairly dismissed and recorded a remedy award of £5,220.42. The hearing was before Employment Judge Boyes with Mrs Gaywood and Mr Allan sitting as lay members, on 13 to 16 February 2023 at Bury St Edmunds.
The tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination claims. It found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of section 10 of the Equality Act 2010, so those claims were not well founded. The judgment does not record any discrimination remedy because the discrimination claims failed at the liability stage.
For remedy, the tribunal recorded gross weekly pay of £80.19, employment from 20 April 2009 to 22 September 2021, and age at dismissal of 62. It set out a basic award of £1,443.42 and a compensatory award calculation of £2,646.27 for 33 weeks' loss, then noted additional figures for loss of statutory rights and failure to provide fully compliant particulars of employment, together with a 20% ACAS uplift and a 10% reduction for contributory fault, arriving at the final sum of £5,220.42 payable forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and awarded £5,220.42 as the remedy for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £5,220 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of section 10 of the Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,220
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,443
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,646
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 10 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.