Case 3300311/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Yule v Animal Health Trust (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300311/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Yule
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that Animal Health Trust (In Liquidation) failed to comply with its obligations to consult with Mrs N Yule within the meaning of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records that Mrs Yule was dismissed as redundant on or around 31 July 2020.
Because the case was determined under Rule 21, the Tribunal made the declaration on the papers and ordered the Respondent to pay remuneration to the claimant for the protected period, which was stated to be 90 days. The extracted text does not give a monetary total for that award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment declaring that the Respondent failed to comply with its consultation obligations under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour (Consolidation) Act 1992. The Tribunal ordered payment of remuneration for the protected period of 90 days, but no monetary figure was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.