Case 3300312/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Ifeka, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300312/2024
- Decision date
- 5 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms H Ifeka, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record of an oral judgment at Watford via CVP on 4 February 2025 before Employment Judge French dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint in case 3300312/2024 and 3301502/2024. The tribunal recorded that the complaint had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed.
The judgment also records that an application to strike out the claim was refused. The note below the order states that the tribunal would decide at the final hearing whether the claim was presented within the applicable time limit. No monetary remedy was awarded in this decision, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record of the oral judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.