Case 3300324/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Collins v Hanley — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300324/2023
- Decision date
- 25 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant’s employment ended on 30 April 2022. He began ACAS early conciliation on 24 November 2022, received the certificate on 9 December 2022, and presented his claim on 11 January 2023. The tribunal treated the limitation date for the holiday pay issue as 31 May 2022 and the limitation date for the notice pay and redundancy pay issues as 30 April 2022, so the latest ordinary time limit had expired by 30 August 2022.
The judge held that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the arrears of pay, notice pay and holiday pay claims in time. The claimant knew by June 2022 that salary for March and April, notice pay, holiday pay and redundancy pay had not been paid. The tribunal found that his belief that the matter would be resolved did not prevent him from investigating tribunal time limits, and early conciliation did not extend time because it started after the limitation period had already expired. The tribunal also said that, even on the alternative basis that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims earlier, they were not brought within a reasonable period after conciliation ended.
The redundancy payment claim was dealt with separately. The judge was satisfied under section 164 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant had made written requests in time and had received confirmation of entitlement within the six-month period after termination. The judgment adds that, if necessary, time would in any event have been extended because it would have been just and equitable to do so. The tribunal therefore awarded the claimant a redundancy payment of £11,991 and recorded no other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay claim. The tribunal held it was presented outside the time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it made no merits decision. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. The tribunal held it was presented outside the time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it made no merits decision. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement / payment in lieu claim under the Working Time Regulations. The tribunal held it was presented outside the time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it made no merits decision. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £11,991. | Upheld | — | £11,991 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,991
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period thereafter
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Regulation 30 WTR 1998
- s.164 ERA 1996
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.