Mr C Damian v Sabah Arif — 2025

Case reference: 3300325/2024
Decision date: 24 April 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill Approved

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Damian

Respondent

Sabah Arif

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This Rule 22 judgment against Sabah Arif upheld two monetary claims brought by Mr C Damian. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,382.04 net.

It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £784.64 gross. No other remedy components were recorded in the judgment, and the decision was approved by Employment Judge Quill on 15 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 24 April 2025.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,382.04 for an unauthorised deduction from wages.	Upheld	—	£1,382
Holiday pay	The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £784.64 for failure to pay holiday entitlement.	Upheld	—	£785

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,167; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.