Case 3300334/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Ahmed v Paack — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300334/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 24 March 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr T Ahmed an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why his claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 17 February 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Quill struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the reasons; the claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category. The Tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to comply with the order dated 17 February 2024 and did not make written representations or request a hearing following the Tribunal's letter dated 24 March 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.